Can My Prior Claim Be Reopened?

Generally, initial determinations made on your claim are subject to your right to appeal, usually within 60 days. However, in certain instances, a decision which would otherwise be final and binding may be reopened or revised.

SSA may reopen a decision on its own initiative, or, a claimant may request that a previous determination be reopened. In either situation, if SSA decides to reopen a determination or decision, it may revise that determination or decision.

SSA regulations set forth the conditions under which a previous determination may be revisited. Although the regulations sound as if a party to a claim may simply request a reopening and it will be done, it is generally well established that whether or not to reopen a claim is left to the discretion of the Administration.

According to 20 C.F.R. §404.900, an Initial Determination is one made about your entitlement or your continuing entitlement to benefits or about any other matter that gives you a right to further review. Regulations differentiate between actions that are deemed initial determinations and those actions deemed not to be initial determinations.

Administrative actions that are not initial determinations may be reviewed by SSA, but are not subject to the administrative review process, and are not subject to judicial review. Denying a request to reopen a determination or a decision is considered such an action.

Therefore, denial of a request to reopen is not grounds for appeal. Nevertheless, regulations do provide for three conditions for reopening an otherwise closed case. The most generous provision allows for reopening a case for any reason within twelve months of the initial determination. Again, the refusal by SSA to reopen a case within twelve months for any reason is not subject to appeal.

The second listed condition listed is within four years (two years for SSI), for good cause. Good cause includes new and material evidence, clerical errors in computations of benefits, or evidence that, on its face, was clearly construed in error. A change in the law is not considered good cause.

Finally, a case may be reopened at any time if the determination was induced by fraud or similar fault. The regulation goes on to list what it means by similar fault, and includes instances related to death, convictions, and other clerical errors.

Most often, the request for reopening situation arises when a claimant has had a previous claim denied, but files a new claim that is subsequently approved. The question then becomes whether the previously denied claim can be reopened, effectively granting a claimant more back pay. Because of the huge backlog and the slow pace at which SSA adjudicates claims, it often happens that the request for reopening cannot be made for any reason under paragraph 1, and the good cause provisions of paragraph 2 come into play, ostensibly allowing for reopening within 4 years if the provisions can be met. As a matter of practice, the most common good cause would have to do with new and material evidence that relates back to the period of the initially denied claim.

In the end though, a claimant may not demand reopening under any of these provisions. It may only be requested. And, if denied, the decision may not be appealed.


VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Proving a Disability Based on Depression

It is estimated that today, approximately 19 million American adults are currently living with Major Depression. Major depression can be a debilitating disease that requires treatment in the form of medicine and therapy to resolve. For many Americans, depression affects their ability to function day to day and prevents them from holding a steady job. When trying to obtain Social Security Disability benefits due to Major Depression, it is important to know the criteria that Social Security uses to determine whether an individual’s depression is severe. This article will explain the evaluation process that Social Security decision makers use to evaluate a claimant’s case, and it will recommend ways to build up a strong case when applying for benefits.


What Social Security is Looking For?


Unlike physical impairments, where it’s easy to prove a disability using x-rays or blood tests, mental impairments are largely based on the subjective complaints an individual makes to their mental health doctors. Therefore, an individual alleging a disabling mental condition must be seeing a mental health professional. One of the first things Social Security looks for when evaluating a claim for benefits for depression is treatment records. A lack of treatment implies that the person is able to manage the depression by him or herself, and therefore the condition is not severe enough to prevent them from working. Missed appointments or gaps in the records tend to show that the individual either does not need help or is contributing to their impairment by not complying with proper treatment.

In the records themselves, Social Security looks for symptoms. For Major Depression, there must be consistent records stating that 4 of the following severe symptoms have persisted despite treatment: anhedonia or pervasive loss of interest in almost all activities, appetite disturbance with change in weight, sleep disturbance, psychomotor agitation or retardation, decreased energy, feelings of guilt or worthlessness, difficulty concentrating or thinking, thoughts of suicide, or hallucinations, delusions, or paranoid thinking.

Once it is determined that at least 4 of the above symptoms exist despite ongoing treatment, Social Security checks to see if the symptoms have lasted or will likely last at least 12 months.

Next, Social Security evaluates the impact these symptoms have on an individual’s ability to function. Though the symptoms may exist, they may be mild and therefore a person can potentially work despite the symptoms being present. However, if the symptoms are very severe, they would probably prevent the person from working at any job.

At this step, Social Security needs the help of a mental health expert to help determine the severity of the symptoms. A treating psychologist or psychiatrist is in the best position to provide an opinion as to the level of impairment their patient’s symptoms are causing. Specifically, Social Security is interested on how much an individual’s depressive symptoms interfere with their ability to perform activities of daily living, how much interference there is with normal social functioning, how much the depression effects a person’s ability to concentrate, persist or keep a working pace, and how many episodes of decompensation the depression has caused. If a treating doctor does not provide information on the severity of the claimant’s depression, one of Social Security’s medical examiners will provide such an opinion based on either an examination or a review of the records.


Presenting a Strong Case


Of course the most important part of proving a case for disability to be able to present treatment records. Not being able to afford treatment is not an excuse because there are free clinics and county mental health facilities that can assist those in dire financial shape. All claimants should have records to prove that they in fact do have a diagnosis of major depression.

It is important to discuss the symptoms of your depression with your doctor so that these symptoms can be written in your record.

To prove that the symptoms severely impact your ability to work, a statement from your doctor is necessary. Because a person’s treating doctor is most familiar with their case, that doctor’s opinion is usually given the most weight and therefore it’s vital to proving the case for disability. The opinion of the treating doctor can be in the form of a short narrative or can be provided as part of the doctor’s progress notes.

Social Security evaluators also look for in-patient stays at mental health facilities to determine if the individual shows signs of decompensation or an inability to function outside a highly structured living arrangement.

Another tool used to determine the severity of a claimant’s depression is their GAF, or Global Assessment of Functioning score. The GAF tells how well an individual functions in their life. Scores of less than 50 tend to show that an individual is below the normal level social functioning and has a significant impairment in this area.

Social Security red flags, which are often used as the basis for denials, are drug use and non-compliance. Claimants who use drugs or alcohol when they have depression are often denied because the effects of the substance cannot be distinguished from the effects of the mental impairment. Therefore, it is viewed as though the claimant is contributing to their disability. It is advantageous to have sustained sobriety from drugs and alcohol for at least 6 months before applying for disability benefits due to depression. Also, claimants who fail to take their medications are considered to be contributing to their impairment. Such cases are often denied because it is presumed that with proper medical management, the depression would resolve.


Therefore, to strengthen a case for disability based on depression, the following should be part of the record: consistent visits with the mental health doctor which state the symptoms of depression, compliance with medications, sobriety from street drugs and alcohol, and a supportive statement from the treating doctor which explains the level of impairment the depression causes in the individual.



VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Reasons Why You May Not Get Social Security Supplemental (SSI) Benefits For Which You Are Otherwise Eligible

This article intends to help applicants avoid the pitfalls that cause their ineligibility for payment in spite of their qualifying disability. As codified by the Code of Federal Regulations, the following are the top reasons why applicants may not receive benefits in spite of their eligibility.

You do not give Social Security Administration (SSA) permission to contact financial institutions.

Because SSI is a need-based program, SSA must be able to determine your eligibility by reviewing financial information on your resources and assets. Therefore, upon application, you must authorize the SSA permission to review records from banks, credit cards, loan companies, trust companies, savings associations, and any other source that would reveal the current state of your financial status. Permission in certain circumstances may include access to financial information by other relevant persons, i.e. your spouse or others living in your household. Social Security disability attorney may help you navigate these rules. However, applicant for social security benefits should be prepared with bank records or other financial information to make available to your reviewer upon request. Requesting records beforehand can significantly reduce any delays on your payments.

You leave the United States.

Put simply, you lose your eligibility for SSI benefits for any month during all of which you are outside of the United States. If you are outside of the United States for 30 days or more in a row, you are not considered to be back in the United States until you are back for 30 days in a row. You may again be eligible for SSI benefits in the month in which the 30 days end if you continue to meet all other eligibility requirements (CFR 416.215). During the application process itself, you may be required to fill out supplemental information regarding your daily activities and medical treatment. If you are outside the United States you may miss an opportunity to respond to such inquiries and consequently be denied. While your social security attorney may help you keep abreast of any deadlines, your participation is still material to the outcome of your case.

You do not apply for other benefits.

If you do not apply for other benefits then you may be denied or your payments suspended. Other benefits include any payments for which you can apply that are available to you on an ongoing or one-time basis of a type that includes annuities, pensions, retirement benefits, or disability benefits. For example, "other benefits" includes veterans' compensation and pensions, workers' compensation payments, Social Security insurance benefits and unemployment insurance benefits (CFR 416.210). You may consult with your social security attorney to determine what types of benefits might be available to you. The most obvious, Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), can be available if you have earned enough work credits through your contributions. In these cases, Social Security disability insurance benefits may be higher and entitle you to Medicare versus the Medicaid provided by SSI.

You are disabled and drug addiction or alcoholism is a contributing factor material to the determination of disability.

Drug addiction and alcoholism are major impediment to your initial award of benefits. Most judges are very careful to evaluate whether the severity of your disability is a result of your addiction. In which case, judges may deny benefits based citing non-compliance with medical treatment. If you receive benefits because you are disabled and drug addiction or alcoholism is a contributing factor material to the determination of disability (CFR 416.935), you must avail yourself of any appropriate treatment for your drug addiction or alcoholism at an approved institution or facility when this treatment is available and make progress in your treatment. You are not eligible for SSI benefits beginning with the month after the month you are notified in writing that we determined that you have failed to comply with the treatment requirements. If your benefits are suspended because you failed to comply with treatment requirements, you will not be eligible to receive benefits until you have demonstrated compliance with treatment for a period of time. As a general rule, social security applicants that have not remained sober for a period of six months should be apprised of consequences related to their addiction. For more detail, such applicant should consult with a social security attorney.

Social Security application process is riddled with rules. Applicants should seek legal advice from a social security attorney before they proceed with an application.


VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Rheumatoid Arthritis: How Will Social Security Administration Evaluate Your Disability Claim?

When applying for Social Security Disability benefits, it is imperative to be regular and consistent in the medical documentation of your case. A Social Security attorney may help guide as to how the information from your records translates to the criteria and evaluation of your condition by the Social Security Administration (SSA). This article will discuss the criteria that relates to Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long-term disease that leads to inflammation of the joints and surrounding tissues. It can also affect other organs. RA usually affects joints on both sides of the body equally. Wrists, fingers, knees, feet, and ankles are the most commonly affected. The course and the severity of the illness can vary considerably.
Depending on the severity of your RA and how it specifically impairs your ability to work, you may be successful on your claim if you meet the criteria stipulated in the in Listing 14.09 of the SSA Listings of Impairments:
Inflammatory arthritis (14.09).
a. General. The spectrum of inflammatory arthritis includes a vast array of disorders that differ in cause, course, and outcome. Clinically, inflammation of major peripheral joints may be the dominant manifestation causing difficulties with ambulation or fine and gross movements; there may be joint pain, swelling, and tenderness. The arthritis may affect other joints, or cause less limitation in ambulation or the performance of fine and gross movements. However, in combination with extra-articular features, including constitutional symptoms or signs (severe fatigue, fever, malaise, involuntary weight loss), inflammatory arthritis may result in an extreme limitation.
Barring the severe manifestations of your RA as described in the listing, your evaluator and Social Security Attorney may present at case based on how SSA evaluates pain and resulting limitations.
The Standard of "Pain"
In 1984, Congress passed the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act, which defined the standard of judgment on pain. It stated that:
…an individual's statement as to pain or other symptoms shall not alone be conclusive evidence of disability as defined in this section; there must be medical signs and findings established by medically acceptable clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques which show the existence of a medical impairment that results from anatomical, physiological or psychological abnormalities which could reasonably be expected to produce the pain or other symptoms alleged.
Though this act had an expiration date of 1986, it became the standard of judgment. In 1988, Social Security ruled there need not be objective evidence of the degree of pain.
Several factors are used in the standard judgment of pain including:
• the nature of the pain
• locations
• onset
• duration
• frequency
• radiation
• pain intensity

Other factors that must be considered in determining proof of pain include: what causes the pain and makes it worse name, dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of pain medications treatment for pain relief other than medications functional restrictions daily activities.
In order to get more personal advice on the merit and strength of your claim for Social Security Disability Benefits, please contact an experienced Social Security attorney.



VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Social Security Disability and Unemployment

To be eligible for Social Security Disability benefits, a claimant must not be able to return to past relevant work, nor to do any other work that exists in significant numbers in the national economy. A disability must last at least 12 months or be expected to result in death.

An application for Social Security Disability benefits is an affirmation of your belief that you are entitled to benefits under the above definitions – in other words, that you are not able to work. In signing your application, you affirm, under penalty of law, that you are making no false statements on your application.

Persons who apply for unemployment insurance must also affirm, under penalty of law, that they are making no false statements on their application. Persons who collect unemployment insurance affirm having looked for work each week, and that, if work was found, they would be ready, willing and able to accept it.

Furthermore, there is another fundamental difference between the two programs. State unemployment agencies expect you to look for work only in your field. They do not expect, for example, an accountant to accept work as a truck driver. But Social Security asks whether you can perform any work that is within your ability, regardless of the fact that you have never done it before. Collecting unemployment insurance may be an indication that you are only looking for work in your own field.

On the other hand, SSA recognizes unsuccessful work attempts. This is when a person tries to go back to work but their disability precludes a successful transition. So, for example, if the accountant, rather than collecting unemployment insurance, tried to take work as a cashier but found after a month or so that he just wasn’t able to do it because of his physical or mental limitations, it demonstrates a willingness to try to work at other jobs. Such unsuccessful work attempts tend to strengthen credibility and show you are not just trying to work the system.

In conclusion, an unemployment claim is tantamount to saying “I am able to work,” while an SSA disability claim is stating “I am not able to work.” Both statements are made under penalty of perjury, but both cannot be true, and it may affect your credibility in one or both forums.


VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Acceptable Medical Sources: Who is considered acceptable and how are unacceptable medical sources treated?

When you apply for social security disability benefits, the Social Security Administration (SSA) uses medical and other evidence to determine whether an individual’s impairment(s) meet the SSA requirements for disability. When making a determination of disability, SSA will consider ALL available evidence in the individual’s case record. This includes medical evidence from acceptable medical sources, other evidence from medical sources, statements by the individual and others about the impairment(s), information from other non-medical sources and decisions by other governmental and nongovernmental agencies. However, not all forms of evidence are given the same weight by SSA when determining whether to award benefits.

Acceptable Medical Sources

SSA makes a distinction between acceptable medical sources and other health care providers who are not acceptable medical sources. Acceptable medical sources are licensed physicians, licensed or certified psychologists, licensed optometrists, licensed podiatrists and qualified speech-language pathologists.

Evidence from acceptable medical sources is needed to establish the existence of a medically determinable impairment. Acceptable medical sources can give medical evidence and can be considered treating sources whose medical opinions may be entitled to controlling weight. Only acceptable medical sources can give medical opinions, which are statements from an acceptable medical source that reflects judgments about the nature and severity of an individual’s impairment. This includes symptoms, diagnosis and prognosis, and what an individual can and cannot do despite their impairments.

READ FULL ARTICLE

VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

What to Expect at a Hearing for Disability Benefits

The hearing for disability benefits will take place as follows:

• The ALJ will start the record and go over preliminary issues such as swearing in all witnesses.

• The ALJ or your social security attorney will elicit your testimony, which will take up the bulk of the hearing. Whether or not it is the ALJ or your social security attorney depends on the ALJ’s preference. Your social security attorney will have an opportunity to ask you additional questions if necessary.

• If present, the ALJ will ask a medical expert to testify about the severity of your condition. Note that many hearings for disability benefits do not have medical experts. This is neither “good” nor “bad.” Often, it just has to do with the ALJ’s preference.

• If present, the ALJ will ask a vocational expert to classify your past work and whether he/she believes you are able to return to it or any other jobs that exist in the national economy. Again, whether or not a vocational expert is present likely has to do with the judge’s preference.

• The judge will close the hearing for disability benefits.

Your Testimony


Either the judge or your social security attorney will elicit your testimony at the hearing. For purposes of this analysis, we will assume the judge is the one asking the questions. The types of questions asked at your hearing will vary, but will fit into the following basic outline:


· Your basic information (age, living situation, etc).
· Your highest level of education
· Your work history over the last 15 years
· Your disabling conditions
· Your medical treatment/medications & side effects
· Your daily activities/how you spend your day
· Your RFC assessment


Your Work History


It is important to note you should be as accurate as possible in describing your past work. You need not know the name of each employer, or exact dates of employment. Further, if you had several jobs but all in the same line of work (i.e., customer service), it’s enough to say “I worked in customer service” for “x” amount of years.


What is especially important, however, is how you performed your jobs. Think of what level of exertion was needed to do your past work. Did you sit all day at your job? Or did you stand most of the day? Was a mix of standing and sitting required? Were you required to lift heavy objects? What was the heaviest object you were required to lift? Above all else, think about why you wouldn’t be able to return to these jobs. Then, think of the easiest job you ever had and why you wouldn’t be able to do that now. At your hearing, this is exactly what you will need to prove.


Remember, whether or not you are able to find work is irrelevant. The process the judge will use to determine whether you’re disabled asks only whether any jobs exist that you might be able to do after figuring in your age, education, and any skills earned from past work.


One final note on working: if you attempted to work at any time during the application process, please make sure to discuss the specifics of the work attempt with your social security attorney. He/she will need to know for how long you worked, how much you made at your job, and the general duties that were required in order to perform the work. Prepared with this information, your social security attorney will be able to advise you as to whether or not you have a viable claim, and if so, how to argue your case effectively.


Your Disabling Conditions


Don’t forget to describe to the ALJ all of your conditions. Describe symptoms in detail, i.e., where the pain is, what is feels like, how often you feel it, its level of intensity with and without medication, on good and bad days, and how many bad days you have in a month. If you have mental and physical conditions, take time to describe each. Don’t forget other non-exertional symptoms like fatigue, difficulty concentrating, poor memory, fear of dealing with the public, etc.


Above all else, your hearing is not a time to be brave. Many claimants are hesitant to talk about a condition that is embarrassing to them. Remember, the judge as well as your social security attorney and any experts in the room are accustomed to hearing this sort of testimony. Do not be ashamed if you become emotional. Claimants who do not get emotional when talking about things that are difficult may seem disingenuous. Your candor and emotional vulnerability will not hurt your claim. One of the main purposes of the hearing is to give the ALJ and opportunity to gauge whether or not you are telling the truth. Thus, providing the most candid and honest answers is of key importance.


Your Medical Treatment


The judge may ask questions about past surgeries, medical tests performed, specialists you’ve seen, physical therapy you’ve tried, whether you’ve been given a cane or walker to help you walk, etc. The judge will want to know what you’ve tried to do in order to get better. The judge will also want to know what medications you’re currently on, and possibly what others you’ve tried. Don’t forget to talk about side effects from your medications as they can be very important. For instance, if pain medication reduces your pain, but makes it so that you are very drowsy and can’t remember to do simple tasks, this is an important detail. It means, while you can do something to help improve your condition, doing so comes with its own repercussions that further affect your ability to function normally.

READ FULL ARTICLE

VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Be informed! Stay in control!

Most claimants applying for Social Security disability benefits are completely in the dark as to how much the lifetime of contributions has been calculated and archived. Unbeknownst to applicants, it can be the details or errors on their records that can hold up their applications for months. These errors can range from unresolved arrest warrants to improper name changes. It is every American’s right to obtain the public information about them. Exercise them and request information about your standing today!

Below are examples of some of the information available:

FACT Query – contains your name, Social Security number, sex, date of birth, address, phone number, direct deposit information, account data, insured status data, payment cycle, primary insurance amount history, benefit data, benefit entitlement data, prisoner data, disability data, hospital insurance data, medical insurance data, medical insurance premiums, third party data, state exchange information, enforcement information, SSI information, overpayment/underpayment information, payment history, appeal information, remittance history

Read Full Article
http://www.socialsecuritylaw.com/blogs/Be-Informed.php


VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Evaluating Severity of Mental Impairments

John M. FitzGerald

When evaluating the severity of mental impairments in a Social Security Disability or SSI claim, The Social Security Administration (SSA) must follow a specific technique at each level in the administrative review process.

The technique is meant to identify the need for additional evidence to determine impairment severity, consider and evaluate functional consequences of the mental disorder as relating to ability to work, and to present findings in a clear and consistent manner.

SSA first evaluates pertinent symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings to determine whether a medically determinable mental impairment is present. If determined that a medically determinable mental impairment exists, SSA must specify the symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings that substantiate the presence of the impairment and document findings.

The degree of functional limitation resulting from the impairment is then rated.
Assessment of functional limitations is a “highly individualized process” that requires consideration of all relevant evidence to obtain a picture of overall degree of functional limitation. All relevant clinical signs and laboratory findings are considered, along with the effects of symptoms, and how ability to function may be affected by factors such as chronic mental disorders, structured settings, medication, and other treatment.

The degree of functional limitation is based on the extent to which one’s impairment interferes with ability to function independently, appropriately, effectively, and on a sustained basis. Thus, such factors as the quality and level of overall functional performance, recurrence of episodes, the amount of supervision or assistance one requires, and the settings in which one is able to function must all be considered.

SSA has identified four broad functional areas in which to rate the degree of functional limitation: Activities of daily living, social functioning concentration, persistence, or pace, and episodes of decompensation.

The first three functional areas are rated using a five-point scale:
None, mild, moderate, marked, and extreme.

The degree of limitation in the fourth functional area is rated using a four-point scale: None, one or two, three, four or more.

The last point on each scale represents a degree of limitation that is incompatible with the ability to do any gainful activity.



After rating the degree of functional limitation, the severity of one’s mental impairment must be determined. If the degree of one’s limitation in the first three functional areas is "none" or "mild" and "none" in the fourth area, the conclusion is one’s impairment is “not severe,” unless evidence indicates there is more than a minimal limitation in ability to do basic work activities.

If one’s mental impairment is severe, it is then determine whether it meets or equals a listed mental disorder. This is done by comparing the medical findings and rating the degree of functional limitation to the criteria of the relevant listing. At the initial and reconsideration levels of the administrative review process, the presence or absence of the criteria and the rating of the degree of functional limitation is recorded on a standard document, known as the Psychiatric Review Technique.

At subsequent levels, the presence or absence of the criteria and the rating of the degree of functional limitation is recorded in the decision, and must show the significant history, including examination and laboratory findings, and the functional limitations that were considered in reaching a conclusion about the severity of the mental impairment. The decision must also include a specific finding as to the degree of limitation in each of the functional areas described above.

If determined that a severe mental impairment neither meets nor equals a listing, one’s residual functional capacity is then assessed at step four of the sequential evaluation process, as in any other case.


VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Budget Cuts in California Adversely Affecting the Disabled

Budget cuts and layoffs have seriously affected many citizens in California over the past year. Even our state’s disabled individuals are now feeling the pressure of this turbulent economic time. On February 20th, California Governor Schwarzenegger signed a spending plan that included proposed cuts to programs that assist the disabled such as IHSS (In Home Support Services) and SSI (Supplemental Social Security). These already limited programs will see further cut backs if California doesn’t receive $11 billion in federal funds to bridge the state’s budget gap.

IHSS is a program that helps individuals over 65 years of age, or disabled and blind individuals. The program provides various services such as housecleaning, meal preparation, laundry, grocery shopping, personal care services (such as bowel and bladder care, bathing, grooming and paramedical services), accompaniment to medical appointments, and protective supervision for the mentally impaired.


SSI is a federal income supplement program funded by general tax revenues which is designed to help aged, blind, and disabled people who have little or no income. It provides individuals who meet the strict qualification requirements with cash to meet basic needs for food, clothing and shelter.

A spokesperson for the San Francisco regional office of the Social Security Administration, Lowell Kepke, stated, "The real question is whether or not California will cut SSI." Although the State Controller's Office is delaying payments for many human services programs beginning this month, according to Mr. Kepke, "SSI/SSP payments will be unchanged for March and April. As far as all future dates, California will have to make a request for a change." It remains to be seen whether the state will request a cut to these payments in May.

For disabled individuals living in the state of California, the idea of more cut backs is frightening. Take for example the case of Michelle Sanchez, a woman living in Sonoma County who is diagnosed with a disabling neurological disorder. She uses a wheel chair for ambulation and also utilizes the assistance of a service dog. Michelle lives in a special facility for disabled adults. Her monthly living expenses are covered in part by SSI, and she relies on caregivers who assist with cooking, cleaning and Michelle’s personal hygiene, paid for by IHSS. Michelle says, “I certainly hope the cuts don’t pass.” For Michelle, and those disabled individuals like her who depend heavily on government assistance, any cuts to SSI and IHSS will affect their quality of life.

Another aspect of the system that will be adversely affected by budge cuts is advocacy. Organizations such as the Mendocino County Health and Human Services Agency (MCDSS) hire advocates that assist disabled individuals apply for benefits. Pam Partee, a Social Security Advocate, works with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and CalWORKS. Both are programs that provide Welfare-to-Work services and temporary cash grants to those who qualify. “It’s trying to get people back on their feet,” says Pam. “Many have never felt plugged into life. They’ve gotten used to feeling marginalized.” Pam says there is a considerable backlog of severely disabled people who were not on Social Security or General Assistance. She says that she assesses their cases and helps them get the benefits they need.

If SSI/SSP cuts go through, more than 1.3 million Californians will be affected. Particularly in Mendocino, 4,170 recipients stand to lose a total of $4,260,000 in grant payments. A reduction in funding for IHSS may cause a large set back in policy goals that aim to increase independent living for disabled individuals.

“It breaks our heart when [our clients] depend on us and we fail them,” says Pam. “If we can help them along, we help the community.”

APPEALING THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DECISION

You should not become discouraged if your claim is initially denied. In a recent year roughly 60% of claims were denied. An SSDI attorney will be able to determine what documentation and evidence will strengthen your claim.

LEVEL 1: RECONSIDERATION OF YOUR INITIAL CLAIM
You must request a reconsideration of your claim within sixty days of receipt of the denial letter. Reconsideration is a complete review of your claim by someone who did not take part in the first decision. They will look at all the evidence submitted when the original decision was made, plus any new evidence.
After approximately four to six months a decision will be reached on the reconsideration request. The case will either be granted benefits or denied again. In some states, this process may vary.

LEVEL 2: HEARING BY AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
If your claim is denied after reconsideration, you have 60 days to request an informal hearing. This will be in front of an administrative law judge who had no part in the first decision or the reconsideration of your case. The judge will listen to witnesses, review medical evidence, and decide your case. An SSDI appeal lawyer will help you prepare for the hearing and represent you at the hearing.
The Judge will not announce a decision at the administrative hearing. It usually takes at least two to three months after the hearing to receive the decision, if not longer. If the decision is favorable, you should receive your first check about eight to twelve weeks after the decision.

LEVEL 3: REVIEW BY THE APPEALS COUNCIL
If the Judge's decision is not in your favor, the next step is to request a review by The Appeals Council. This must be done within sixty days after you have received the hearing decision. You should be represented by an experienced SSI/SSDI lawyer to ensure you have the best chance of winning the appeal.
A failure to appeal by the deadline will result in having to start an entirely new claim unless you can demonstrate good cause for not filing the appeal prior to the deadline. Good cause includes illness, hospitalization, comprehension problems due to mental infirmity, or other circumstances beyond your control.
The Council looks at all requests for review, but it may deny a request if it believes the hearing decision was correct. If the Appeals Council decides to review your case, it will either decide your case itself or return it to an administrative law judge for further review.
If the Appeals Council denies your request for review, you will receive a letter explaining the denial. If the Appeals Council reviews your case and makes a decision itself, you will receive a copy of the decision. If the Appeals Council returns your case to an administrative law judge, you will receive a letter and a copy of the order.

LEVEL 4: FEDERAL COURT
If the Appeals Council denies your appeal and/or refuses to review your case, you have 60 days to file a lawsuit in a federal district court. After reviewing the record from your hearing, the Federal judge can (1) award disability benefits, (2) deny disability benefits, or (3) send your case back to a lower court for an additional hearing. It is critical to have good legal representation to give you the best chance of winning the appeal.

Visit Social Security Law Today

Social Security Disability: How to Prove your Anxiety Disorder Prevents you from Working

Social Security Disability: How to Prove Your Anxiety Disorder Prevents you From Working

By: John M. FitzGerald

As a practical matter, every applicant for disability benefits must either meet the listings or prove inability to work in any significant capacity.

The listings are just what they sound like. Inability equates to disability. So the issue is not whether anyone would hire you, or whether there are factories where you live, but whether a hypothetical person with your limitations can do any type of work that exists in significant numbers in the national economy.

As with exertional impairments, proving disability on the basis of a psychological disorder requires documentation of a severe medically determinable impairment, and an assessment of the degree to which said impairment limits ability to perform work related activity for a period of at least twelve months.

To prevent a person from working, any impairment must be "severe," and psychological impairments are no different.

As with all impairments, the first question is: are you working now? Because if you are working, the likelihood is you are not disabled. If you are not working, the question becomes whether your impairment is severe. If your impairment is not severe, you are not disabled.

To determine whether a mental impairment is severe, SSA looks at 4 criteria: (a) activities of daily living; (b) maintaining social functioning; (c) concentration, persistence and pace; and (d) episodes of decompensation.

With regard to the first three criteria, a person can either have no limitation, moderate limitation, a marked limitation, or an extreme limitation. Any two of the criteria must fall into the "marked" range for an impairment to be considered "severe." If the impairment is severe, the analysis proceeds to step 3, the listings. If it is not severe, the degree of limitation must still be considered in assessing a claimant's residual functional capacity (RFC).

The fourth criteria--episodes of decompensation--is a medical term describing an exacerbation of a claimant's symptoms to the point where further medical intervention is required. If, for example, medications fail to keep a mental condition reasonably well controlled to the point where a patient must be hospitalized or further medicated, then one can say that the patient has lost some measure of composure. Obviously, the more this occurs, the more it interferes with ability to work.

Step 3, the listings, is a claimant's earliest opportunity to win. There are 14 bodily systems represented in the listings, with mental impairments enumerated in section 12.

Read Full Article
http://socialsecuritylaw.com/blogs/Anxiety-Disorder-Prevents-Work.php