The Continuing Disability Review

Once you are receiving Social Security Disability benefits, the Social Security Administration will periodically review your case to make sure that you are still disabled. This review is called a Continuing Disability Review (CDR) and the law requires it . What can you expect from a CDR?
How often a case is reviewed varies from one disability case to another. When a person is found to be disabled, the disability determination specialist sets a date, called a diary, when the next review is scheduled to be performed. Most diaries are based on the expectation of recovery and are for three or seven years, but they can be sooner:
• If medical improvement is “expected”, a case normally will be reviewed within six to 18 months;
• If medical improvement is “possible”, a case normally will be reviewed no sooner than three years;
• If medical improvement is “not expected”, a case normally will be reviewed no sooner than seven years.
The CDR is a medical review. SSA is trying to decide if your level of disability has improved to the point where you have medically recovered and are able to work. The evidence that SSA will need for your CDR is similar to what it needed for your initial claim for Social Security Disability benefits. SSA will have you fill out forms describing your current condition and list all of the places where you have received treatment. SSA will also obtain copies of all recent medical records. If more information is needed about your condition, SSA may schedule a Consultative Exam. If your condition has not improved since SSA last reviewed your case, then your Social Security benefits will continue. If your condition has improved, SSA will look to see if your condition meets the current disability requirements.
It is important that when you receive the CDR notice and forms that you fill them out and return them. If you receive the CDR Mailer and throw it in the trash, SSA will send a second one. Continued failure to provide information that SSA asks for, or failure to attend an examination that it schedules, will result in termination of benefit payments. You may need help answering the questions, especially if you are not certain what is being asked and why. This is where an attorney may help.
Continuing Disability Reviews for Children
When a person is found to be disabled under childhood regulations, SSA will review the case when the person turns 18 to determine if the person is disabled under the adult regulations. The case is reviewed as if it were a new case. SSA is looking to see how your disability affects your ability to work as an adult. Even if your condition has not improved, your benefits will cease if your condition does not meet the current adult rules.
Tips for a Continuing Disability Review
SSA looks at the original status of your medical condition(s) and compares it to the current status of your medical condition(s) to decide if there has been significant medical improvement. For this reason, it is important that you continue to seek medical treatment for your condition. If you have not continued to seek medical treatment, SSA will likely order a Consultative Exam to assess your current condition. It is usually more beneficial


VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

The Social Security Backlog

Recently, there has been a proliferation of articles concerning the growing backlog of Social Security Disability cases, and the regulations SSA Commissioner Michael J. Astrue proposes to address what is becoming an enormous hardship on disabled applicants. It is not unusual for applicants to wait more than three years to get a hearing.

Most often, these claimants have no savings, no income, and no insurance, even for necessary treatment or medications. Unfortunately, before their benefits are awarded, they lose their possessions, go bankrupt, their utilities are shut off, and ultimately are forced to move from their homes with no place else to go. In the worst cases, the claimant’s die.

Since the inception of the disability program in the 1950s, the standard for approval has been intentionally strict. It is designed more to weed out malingerers than it is to help the disabled. A claimant must prove either an illness expected to result in death or inability to do not only past work, but any work that exists “in significant numbers in the national economy.”

According to SSA, in January 2005 nearly 8 million disabled workers and their dependents received DI benefits, a 100% increase since 1985. Another 6 million adults and children receive SSI payments, a 135% increase in the same period.

Nationally, about 750,000 appeals are pending. That is double the number in 2000. The wait time varies by location, but the national average is 524 days. Many offices take much longer. In Omaha, for example, the average processing time is 639 days from date of appeal to the hearing level. Of the 143 hearing offices in the country, 22 have longer processing times.

In 2006, SSA implemented a new Administrative Review Process known as the Disability Service Improvement (DSI) process to address the backlog. Presently, Boston is the only region using the system. The new regulations provided that SSA would wait at least one year (from August 1, 2006) before implementing a second region.

The new rules include an initial application and review by a Federal reviewing official. The right to appeal to an ALJ remains intact. However, the judge’s decision is final unless the claim is referred to the Decision Review Board (DRB). A DRB review remains the final decision at the Administrative level. The Appeals Council will eventually be phased out.

Other changes include a new electronic filing system, presently in use in all 1,338 field offices, taking 20,000 claims per day. SSA is also implementing systems to streamline the updating of medical listings and to close the records in hearings faster by requiring all medical evidence to be submitted at least 5 days prior to hearing. The claimant is to be notified at least 75 days before the hearing, rather than the previous 20.

According to a recent article in The New York Times, about two-thirds of the 2.5 million disability applicants each year are denied at the initial state determination levels. Of the approximately 575,000, who file appeals requesting to be heard before an administrative law judge, about two-thirds win a reversal.

Reasons officials attribute to the high reversal rate include the supposition that many of the claimant’s impairments increase in severity by the time of hearing. The judge gets to meet the claimant face-to-face. The belief is that those who appeal are those with the strongest cases or who tend to get lawyers to help with presentation.


VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY