Obesity: How Social Security Evaluates Obesity in Determining Whether an Adult is Disabled

The Social Security Administration defines obesity as “a complex, chronic disease characterized by excessive accumulation of body fat.” SSR 02-1p. Medical criteria have been established to determine whether an individual is overweight based upon their body mass index (BMI). Social Security uses this criteria to help determine whether an individual is obese, but also uses other evidence in determining obesity.

Social Security originally had a listing specifically for obesity; however this listing was removed in 1999 because Social Security felt that it did not represent a degree of functional limitation that would prevent an individual from working. Despite removing obesity as a listing, Social Security still evaluates obesity in determining whether an individual is disabled.

Obesity will be considered in four different parts of the evaluation process. It will be considered in determining:

1. Whether the individual has a medically determinable impairment;
2. Whether the impairment is severe;
3. Whether the impairment meets or equals a listing; and
4. Whether the impairment(s) prevent the individual from doing past relevant work or any other work.

Medically Determinable Impairment

When determining whether an individual’s obesity constitutes a medically determinable impairment Social Security will look at the evidence in the record. If the evidence in the record includes a diagnosis of obesity then Social Security will accept this diagnosis unless there is other evidence in the record to the contrary. When the evidence in the record does not include a diagnosis, but does include consistent notes about high body weight or BMI the Social Security Administration will use its own judgment to determine whether obesity exists.

Impairment is Severe

Obesity is considered to be severe when it alone or with other conditions, significantly limits an individual’s physical or mental ability to do basic work activities. If it is a slight abnormality that has no more than a minimal effect on the individual’s ability to do basic work activities, than the impairment is not severe. There is no specific BMI that equates with a finding of severe or not severe, instead it is an individualized assessment of the impact of obesity on an individual’s functioning.
If an individual’s obesity is determined to be severe, then the Social Security Administration may find that the obesity medically equals a listing.

Impairment Meets or Equals a Listing

Obesity may be a factor in both meeting and equaling a listing. Since there is no longer a listing for obesity you cannot meet a listing without having another condition that either, by itself or in combination with obesity, meets the requirements of a listing.
The Social Security Administration can find an individual’s obesity to be medically equivalent or equal a listed impairment. For example if the obesity is of such a level that it results in the inability to ambulate effectively then it may equal listing 1.02A. Obesity can also be combined with other impairments to equal a listing.

Whether the Impairment(s) prevent the individual from doing past relevant work or other work obesity can cause limitation of function. When determining whether obesity by itself or in combination with other conditions prevents an individual from returning to their previous work or other work the Social Security Administration will determine an individual’s residual functioning capacity. To do this an assessment will be made of the effect obesity has upon the individual’s ability to perform routine movement and necessary activity within the work environment. Social Security will then use this information to determine whether an individual can return to their previous work or do any other work.

Even though obesity is no longer a listing it is still a very important factor to be evaluated in determining whether an individual is disabled. Obesity can make the difference between a favorable and unfavorable determination, so if you suffer from obesity it is important to mention it in your application.

VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

The New "Federal Reviewing Official"

A new position at the federal level called the “Federal Reviewing Official," will be created. This Official will review initial DDS determinations upon the request of the claimant. For a long time, there have been complaints that initial determinations were being made inconsistently, unfairly and inaccurately. The new Federal Review Official will seek to ensure that determinations are made correctly at the beginning stages of the Social Security Disability process. This Official will have the authority to make a decision as to whether an individual is disabled. The Federal Review Officials will be attorneys, centrally managed, and better suited to perform the function of documenting evidence and writing legally sound decisions as to benefits. An individual may submit evidence at any time while the Official is reviewing their case, even up until the decision is issued. An individual may request review by a Federal Reviewing Official within 60 days after receiving notice of their initial denial. Further, under this new rule, if a claimant does not make a request for review within these 60 days, they can still request an extension of time to do so even after the 60 day period has lapsed.

VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY

Social Security Administration Improvements: 2010 Update

Michelle Nevarez, Esq.


The Obama Administration has committed to helping our fellow Americans in need by allocating more of the Nation’s budget to the preservation and improvement of the Social Security disability insurance approval process. In response to increased application in addition to existing backlog of claims, SSA has committed to increasing their processing capacities in a number of ways.


Extended Service Team(EST) are new centralized units that tasked to assist in with hearing backlog in flood areas that experienced increased applications. The purpose of these teams is explained by SSA Commisioner Astrue, “These centralized units have reduced the hearings backlog and improved processing times at some of the hardest-hit hearing offices....”

In FY 2010, SSA plans to place 280 new employees in four States (Virginia, Arkansas, Oklahoma , and Mississippi ) to help staff the teams that will be able to quickly take cases from the hardest hit States.
DDS Federal Units in each of the ten regions are tasked with assisting the DDSs in processing cases. In FY 2010, we plan to provide 237 additional hires in these units. The increases at the DDA level also include more medical consultants in order to prevent expensive and much dreaded consultative examination.

Virtual Screening Units have been erected with senior attorneys tasked to review the disability hearing backlog for potential awards.SSA believes that the screening methodology and the electronic folder to move work to the members of the virtual unit will identify about 14,600 on-the-record, fully favorable awards this year without a hearing.

SSA eligibility and processing requirements are in constant flux, for this reason you should take a moment to update yourself on the changes in 2010 eligibility requirements.

VISIT SOCIAL SECURITY LAW TODAY